美國의 海運 政策 關聯法의 問題點과 影響
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 林敬民著 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-22T06:05:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-02-22T06:05:10Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 56797-10-27 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://kmou.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000002173856 | ko_KR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.kmou.ac.kr/handle/2014.oak/9065 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper is regarding the Problems and Effects of U.S.A Shipping Policy Related Acts against worldwide shipping market. We have a longtime good relationship with U.S.A in various fields as well as shipping parts. And U.S.A shipping acts have impacted on worldwide shipping including Korea's. This subject focus on attaining five purposes 1) The history of U.S.A Shipping Acts. 2) Shipping Act of 1984. 3) The U.S Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998. 4) The Problems and Effects of U.S.A Shipping Policy Related Acts. 5) The Korea shipping countermeasure against U.S.A Shipping Act. This study consists of six chapters. The first chapter reads a general introduction of this subject. The second chapter, the review of the history of U.S.A shipping acts as in age order with Shipping Acts and Merchant Marine Acts respectively. The third chapter lay out the descriptions of Shipping Act of 1984, and the effects on the world shipping market. And then, the fourth chapter concentrate on the U.S Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998, from that it was passed by Congress and signed into law in October 1998. its provisions take effect May 1, 1999. The fifth chapter critically reviews in current U.S.A shipping act's injustice aspects. and propose the countermeasure to cope with current U.S.A shipping act. finally, the last chapter offers a conclusion to this paper. The America shipping policy is consisted in Shipping act and Merchant Marine Act which are two public law scheme. However, they don't distinguish them each other. Shipping act is for externally enacting America shipping policy specially against shipping conference and worldwide shipping market. Merchant Marine Act interiorly purposed the America shipping industry promotion. The shipping act of 1916 was the first United States legislation which was used to regulate the practices of steamship liners serving within the United States. And then, it was adjusted into shipping act of 1961, newly the shipping act of 1984 was legislated to establish a nondiscriminatory regulatory process for the common carriage of goods by water in the foreign commerce of the United States with a minimum of government intervention and regulatory costs, and to provide an efficient and transportation system in the ocean commerce of the United States that is, insofar as possible, in harmony with, and responsive to, international shipping practices, and to encourage the development of an economically sound and efficient United States-flag liner fleet capable of meeting national security needs. Also it was reformed into 'the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998', and the purpose was added 'To promote the growth and development of United States exports through competitive and efficient ocean transportation and by placing a greater reliance on the marketplace.' Currently, the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998 modifying the shipping Act of 1984 is coming into effect in worldwide shipping market. It has many injustice aspects as follows. 1) It's excessive a protective policy to the United States shipping liners. Therefore, FMC restricts the worldwide shipping market and oversea shipping liners. 2) The shipping liners should concentrate on U.S.A shipping acts in order to avoid violation. 3) Conference lost freight and market adjustment ability with the effectuation of shipping act of 1984 and OSRA, Therefore, if the market slow down, they may be liable to cause property damage. 4) The medium and small size shippers have a tough in the recent shipping market with the effectuation of shipping act of 1984 and OSRA 5) NVOCC will not be allowed to offer service contracts. Consequently, they are less competitive than common carriers. The Korea liner companies have to overcome U.S.A shipping acts in this situation as following strategies. Firstly, they must meet the needs of the times on computerization age in global network fields. And then, shippers have to try to get more information on freight, liner service and so on. Also, they must organize shipper's association in order to contract more competitive freight and service condition with Liner. | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 목차 第1障 序論 = 6 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 6 第2節 硏究의 方法 및 範圍 = 7 第2障 海運政策 關聯法의 沿革 = 10 第1節 海運政策의 方向 = 10 第2節 1916年 以前의 海運政策 關聯法 = 13 第3節 海運法 = 16 1. 1916년 해운법(Shipping Act of 1916) = 16 2. 1961년 해운법(Shipping Act of 1961) = 18 3. 1978년 해운법(Ocean Shipping Act of 1978) = 20 4. 1984년 해운법(Shipping Act of 1984) = 21 5. 1998년 미국외항해운개혁법(U.S Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998) = 21 第4節. 商船法 = 22 1. 1920년 상선법(Merchant Marine Act of 1920) = 22 2. 1936년 상선법(Merchant Marine Act of 1936) = 23 3. 1946년 상선법(The Merchant Ship Sales Act of 1946) = 24 4. 1970년 상선법(Merchant Marine Act of 1970) = 25 第3障 1984年 海運法의 內容과 影響 = 27 第1節. 立法 背景 = 27 第2節 主要 內容 = 28 1. 84년 해운법의 제정목적 = 28 2. 獨占禁止法 適用免除 = 28 3. 獨自行動權(Independent Action : I/A)의 도입 = 30 4. 貨物優待運賃(Time/Volume Rate : TVR)의 도입 = 31 5. 優待運送契約(Service Contract : S/C)의 도입 = 32 6. 二重運賃契約制의 실질적 금지 = 33 7. 미국선사의 보호 = 34 8. 국영선사의 통제 = 34 9. 荷主團體(SA)의 인정 = 35 10. 無船舶運送人(NVOCC)의 법적 지위 인정 = 36 11. 해운동맹자문위원 = 36 第3節. 外航定期船 海運市場에 미치는 影響 = 37 1. 해운동맹에 미친 영향 = 37 2. 선박대형화의 촉진 = 40 3. 하주에 미친 영향 = 41 4. 복합운송에 미친 영향 = 42 第4障 1998年 外航海運改革法의 內容과 影響 = 43 第1節. 制定 背景과 特徵 = 43 第2節 內容 = 45 1. 法의 執行機關 = 45 2. 태리프(Tariff) 申告 및 免除品目 = 46 3. 테리프(Tariff) 申告機關 및 申告方法 = 47 4. 置運賃還割引 및 二重運賃契約制 = 48 5. 荷主差別待遇 = 48 6. 優待運送契約 (Service Contract) = 49 7. 내륙운송비협상 = 51 8. 운임동맹의 태리프(Tariff) 및 優待運送契約(S/C)에 관한 獨自行動權(I/A) = 51 9. 미국선사보호 = 52 10. 海上貨物 및 運送周旋人, 無船舶運送人(NOVCC) = 52 11. 기타 변경 사항 = 54 第4節. 外航定期船 海運市場에 미치는 影響 = 55 1. 해운규제의 완화 = 55 2. 하주의 교섭력 증대 = 56 3. 해운동맹의 붕괴 및 신협조체제 등장 = 57 4. GLOBAL 제휴의 확산 및 합병시대의 도래 = 57 5. GLOBAL SERVICE 계약 시대의 도래 = 59 第5障 海運政策 關聯法의 問題點과 對應方案 = 60 第1節 海運企業의 觀點 = 60 1. 선사 측면에서의 문제점 = 60 2. 운임동맹 측면에서의 문제점 = 64 3. 미국내 하역,내륙운송업체, 해상터미널운영업자 측면에서의 문제점 = 68 4. 해운기업의 관점에서 대응 방안 = 71 第2節 荷主의 觀點 = 73 1. 하주 측면에서의 문제점 = 73 2. 하주의 관점에서 대응 방안 = 74 第3節 複合運送의 觀點 = 76 1. 복합운송측면에서의 문제점 = 76 2. 복합운송의 관점에서 대응 방안 = 81 第4節 制度的 觀點 = 83 1. 84년 해운법 및 98년 외항해운개혁법의 보호주의적 성향 = 83 2. 연방해사 위원회(FMC)의 기능적 측면에서의 문제점 = 85 3. 정기선동맹협약(UNCTAD LINER CODE)측면에서의 문제점 = 89 3. 제도적 관점에서 대응 방안 = 92 第5節 立法的 改善 方向 = 93 第6障 結論 = 96 | - |
dc.publisher | 한국해양대학교 대학원 | - |
dc.title | 美國의 海運 政策 關聯法의 問題點과 影響 | - |
dc.title.alternative | A Study on the Problems and Effects of U.S.A Shipping Policy Related Acts | - |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.